Working Paper
Fiscal Dominance
Abstract: Who prevails when fiscal and monetary authorities disagree about the value of public expenditure and how much to discount the future? When the fiscal authority sets debt as its main policy instrument it achieves fiscal dominance, rendering the preferences of the central bank, and thus its independence, irrelevant. When the central bank sets the nominal interest rate it renders fiscal impatience (its debt bias) irrelevant, but still faces its expenditure bias. I find that the expenditure bias is about an order of magnitude more severe than the debt bias and has a major impact on welfare through higher public spending, while the effect on other policies is relatively minor. I also find that the central bank can do little to overcome the negative impact of the fiscal authority's expenditure bias, though there are still gains from properly designing the central bank.
Keywords: discretion; time-consistency; government debt; deficit; inflation; institutional design; political frictions;
JEL Classification: E52; E58; E61; E62;
https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2020.040
Access Documents
File(s):
File format is application/pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2020/2020-040.pdf
Description: Full Text
Authors
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Part of Series: Working Papers
Publication Date: 2020-10-29
Number: 2020-040
Related Works
- Working Paper Revision (2023-08-26) : Fiscal Dominance
- Working Paper Revision (2023-02-27) : Fiscal Dominance
- Working Paper Revision (2021-09-20) : Fiscal Dominance
- Working Paper Original (2020-10-29) : You are here.