Working Paper Revision
Fiscal Dominance
Abstract: Central banks' resolve and independence are chronically tested by fiscal authorities wishing to impose their desired policies, often leading to socially undesirable economic outcomes. I study how the fiscal and monetary authorities' disagreement over outcomes and their choice of active instruments shape the implementation of policy, dispensing with commitment or first-mover advantage. I characterize the equilibrium for various combinations of active (and correspondingly, passive) instruments, identify which sources of disagreement play a role in each case, and show whether and under what conditions time-consistency problems may disappear in the long-run. When the fiscal authority sets debt levels actively, it may be able to impose its preferences on the central bank, regardless of how monetary policy is conducted. Designing a central bank with a special concern for liquidity markets counteracts this result.
Keywords: discretion; time-consistency; government debt; deficit; inflation; institutional design; political frictions; fiscal dominance; central bank independence; active vs passive policies; unpleasant monetarist arithmetic;
JEL Classification: E52; E58; E61; E62;
https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2020.040
Access Documents
File(s):
File format is application/pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2020/2020-040.pdf
Description: Full Text
Authors
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Part of Series: Working Papers
Publication Date: 2023-08-26
Number: 2020-040
Related Works
- Working Paper Revision (2023-08-26) : You are here.
- Working Paper Revision (2023-02-27) : Fiscal Dominance
- Working Paper Revision (2021-09-20) : Fiscal Dominance
- Working Paper Original (2020-10-29) : Fiscal Dominance