Working Paper
Implementing the Modified Golden Rule? Optimal Ramsey Capital Taxation with Incomplete Markets Revisited
Abstract: What is the prescription of Ramsey capital taxation in the long run? Aiyagari (1995) addressed the question in a heterogeneous-agent incomplete-markets (HAIM) economy, showing that a positive capital tax should be imposed to implement the so-called modified golden rule (MGR). This paper revisits the long-standing issue. We first show that the Aiyagari?s result holds if the shadow price of raising government revenues through distorting taxes converges to zero in the limit at the Ramsey optimum. This ?if? is clearly a strong condition. As long as the condition fails to hold, we show (i) there is no Ramsey steady state when the elasticity of intertemporal substitution (EIS) is weakly less than 1, and (ii) a Ramsey steady state is possible if EIS is larger than 1 but the MGR does not hold and the corresponding capital tax is non-positive. The key to our non-existence result is embedded in the hallmark of the HAIM economy: the risk-free gross interest rate is lower than the inverse of the preference discount factor in steady state.
Keywords: Capital Taxation; Modified Golden Rule; Ramsey Problem; Incomplete Markets;
JEL Classification: C61; E22; E62; H21; H30;
https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2017.003
Access Documents
File(s):
File format is application/pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2017/2017-003.pdf
Description: Full Text
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Part of Series: Working Papers
Publication Date: 2017-03-27
Number: 2017-3
Pages: 34 pages
Related Works
- Working Paper Revision (2020-10-01) : Implementing the Modified Golden Rule? Optimal Ramsey Capital Taxation with Incomplete Markets Revisited
- Working Paper Revision (2020-04-15) : Implementing the Modified Golden Rule? Optimal Ramsey Capital Taxation with Incomplete Markets Revisited
- Working Paper Original (2017-03-27) : You are here.