Working Paper Revision
Implementing the Modified Golden Rule? Optimal Ramsey Capital Taxation with Incomplete Markets Revisited
Abstract: What is the prescription of Ramsey capital taxation in the long run? Aiyagari (1995) addressed the question in a heterogeneous-agent incomplete-markets (HAIM) economy, showing that a positive capital tax should be imposed to implement the so-called modified golden rule (MGR). This paper revisits the long-standing issue. Working with commonly used separable isoelastic preferences, we show (i) the multiplier on the resource constraint of the Ramsey problem must diverge in the limit if a Ramsey steady state exists, (ii) there is no Ramsey steady state when the elasticity of intertemporal substitution (EIS) is weakly less than 1, and (iii) a Ramsey steady state is possible if the EIS is larger than 1 but the MGR does not hold and the corresponding capital tax is non-positive. The key to our results is embedded in the hallmark of the HAIM economy: the risk-free gross interest rate is lower than the inverse of the preference discount factor in steady state.
Keywords: Capital Taxation; Modified Golden Rule; Ramsey Problem; Incomplete Markets;
JEL Classification: C61; E22; E62; H21; H30;
https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2017.003
Access Documents
File(s):
File format is application/pdf
https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2017/2017-003.pdf
Description: Full text
Authors
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Part of Series: Working Papers
Publication Date: 2020-04-15
Number: 2017-003