Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Author:Moen, Jon R. 

Journal Article
Lessons from the panic of 1907

Economic Review , Issue May , Pages 2-13

Journal Article
Fewer older men in the U.S. work force: technological, behavioral, and legislative contributions to the decline

Economic Review , Issue Nov , Pages 16-31

Journal Article
Tennessee: challenges ahead

Economic Review , Issue Nov , Pages 37-46

Journal Article
Diversity and balanced growth: Tennessee stays on track

Economic Review , Issue Jan , Pages 58-66

Working Paper
Clearinghouse access and bank runs: trust companies in New York and Chicago during the Panic of 1907

FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 94-12

Working Paper
Clearinghouse access and bank runs: comparing New York and Chicago during the Panic of 1907

During the Panic of 1907, New York City trust companies were not members of the New York Clearinghouse whereas trust companies in Chicago were members of the Chicago Clearinghouse. We argue that the apparent isolation of New York City trust companies from the pool of bank reserves controlled by the New York Clearinghouse led to the large-scale depositor runs on the New York City trusts. In contrast, Chicago trust companies had direct access to the Chicago Clearinghouse and their pool of reserves and did not suffer large-scale depositor withdrawals. Statistical evidence on a cross-section of ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 95-9

Working Paper
Why didn't the United States establish a central bank until after the panic of 1907?

Monetary historians conventionally trace the establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913 to the turbulence of the Panic of 1907. But why did the successful movement for creating a U.S. central bank follow the Panic of 1907 and not any earlier National Banking Era panic? The 1907 panic displayed a less severe output contraction than other national banking era panics, and national bank deposit and loan data suggest only a limited impairment to intermediation through these institutions. ; We argue that the Panic of 1907 was substantially different from earlier National Banking Era ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 99-16

Working Paper
The Transmission of the Financial Crisis in 1907: An Empirical Investigation

Using an extensive high-frequency data set, we investigate the transmission of financial crisis specifically focusing on the Panic of 1907, the final severe panic of the National Banking Era (1863-1913). We trace the transmission of the crisis from New York City trust companies to the New York City national banks through direct and indirect interconnections. Trust companies held cash balances at national banks, and these balances were liquidated as trust companies suffered depositor runs. Secondly, trust companies and national banks were notable creditors to the New York Stock Exchange; when ...
Working Papers (Old Series) , Paper 1409

Working Paper
The call loan market in the U.S. financial system prior to the Federal Reserve System

The call loan market in New York City played a central role in funding the expansion of economic growth and capital investment in the United States in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Changes in the identity of the intermediaries providing those funds help explain why the movement for the establishment of a central bank in the United States took hold only after the panic of 1907. The growing significance of nonclearinghouse creditors to the call money market diluted the relative financial influence of the New York City bankers and compromised the apparent ?coinsurance? arrangement between ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2003-43

PREVIOUS / NEXT