Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Keywords:time series 

Working Paper
Decomposition of feedback between time series in a bivariate error-correction model

This paper adapts Geweke's [1982] method of decomposing the feedback between time series by frequency to the case of 1(1) time series generated by a bivariate error-correction model. The method is applied to long-run data on US and UK price levels with the finding that most of the feedback between the two time series occurs at very low frequencies.
Working Papers , Paper 9712

Working Paper
Predicting Benchmarked US State Employment Data in Real Time

US payroll employment data come from a survey and are subject to revisions. While revisions are generally small at the national level, they can be large enough at the state level to alter assessments of current economic conditions. Users must therefore exercise caution in interpreting state employment data until they are “benchmarked” against administrative data 5–16 months after the reference period. This paper develops a state-space model that predicts benchmarked state employment data in real time. The model has two distinct features: 1) an explicit model of the data revision process ...
Working Papers , Paper 2019-037

Working Paper
A Note on the Finite Sample Bias in Time Series Cross-Validation

It is well known that model selection via cross validation can be biased for time series models. However, many researchers have argued that this bias does not apply when using cross-validation with vector autoregressions (VAR) or with time series models whose errors follow a martingale-like structure. I show that even under these circumstances, performing cross-validation on time series data will still generate bias in general.
Research Working Paper , Paper RWP 25-17

Working Paper
A Note on the Finite Sample Bias in Time Series Cross-Validation

It is well known that model selection via cross validation can be biased for time series models. However, many researchers have argued that this bias does not apply when using cross-validation with vector autoregressions (VAR) or with time series models whose errors follow a martingale-like structure. I show that even under these circumstances, performing cross-validation on time series data will still generate bias in general.
Research Working Paper , Paper RWP 25-17

FILTER BY year

FILTER BY Series

FILTER BY Content Type

FILTER BY Author

FILTER BY Jel Classification

C10 2 items

C50 2 items

C52 2 items

C53 1 items

R11 1 items

FILTER BY Keywords

martingale 2 items

model selection 2 items

model validation 2 items

Benchmarking methods 1 items

Forecasting accuracy 1 items

show more (6)

PREVIOUS / NEXT