Search Results
Interest rate volatility contributed to higher mortgage rates in 2022
Frame, W. Scott; McCormick, Matthew
(2023-04-04)
The Federal Reserve aggressively tightened monetary policy in 2022, responding to high and persistent inflation. The resulting borrowing cost increase for households and firms was generally anticipated. However, fixed-rate mortgage interest rates were especially sensitive to the policy regime change.
Dallas Fed Economics
Journal Article
GSE guarantees, financial stability, and home equity accumulation
Passmore, Wayne; von Hafften, Alexander H.
(2018-24-03)
Before 2008, the government?s ?implicit guarantee? of the securities issued by the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac led to practices by these institutions that threatened financial stability. In 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency placed these GSEs into conservatorship. Conservatorship was intended to be temporary but has now reached its tenth year, and policymakers continue to weigh options for reform. In this article, the authors assess both implicit and explicit government guarantees for the GSEs. They argue that adopting a legislatively defined ...
Economic Policy Review
, Issue 24-3
, Pages 11-27
Report
A private lender cooperative model for residential mortgage finance
Wright, Joshua; Tracy, Joseph; Mosser, Patricia C.; Vickery, James; Dechario, Toni
(2010-08-01)
We describe a set of six design principles for the reorganization of the U.S. housing finance system and apply them to one model for replacing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that has so far received frequent mention but little sustained analysis ? the lender cooperative utility. We discuss the pros and cons of such a model and propose a method for organizing participation in a mutual loss pool and an explicit, priced government insurance mechanism. We also discuss how these principles and this model are consistent with preserving the ?to-be-announced,? or TBA, market ? particularly if the ...
Staff Reports
, Paper 466
Discussion Paper
Why are Adjustable Rate Mortgages So Rare These Days?
Vickery, James
(2011-05-11)
The fraction of mortgage borrowers who choose an adjustable-rate loan has fallen significantly over the past five years or so. Although the fraction edged up slightly in 2010, it remains close to historic lows, with less than 10 percent of mortgage originations since 2009 featuring an adjustable interest rate. What explains the striking decline? And what are its implications for borrowers and policymakers?
Liberty Street Economics
, Paper 20110511
Working Paper
Financial Technology and the Transmission of Monetary Policy: The Role of Social Networks
Zhou, Xiaoqing
(2023-02-14)
Financial technology-based (FinTech) lending is expected to ease U.S. mortgage market frictions that have weakened the transmission of monetary policy to households. This paper establishes that social networks play a key role in consumers’ adoption of FinTech lending, which amplifies the effects of a monetary stimulus. I provide causal estimates of the network effect on FinTech adoption using county-level data. To quantify the role of FinTech lending and network spillovers in the transmission of monetary policy shocks, I build a heterogeneous-agent model with social learning. The model ...
Working Papers
, Paper 2203
Journal Article
Evaluating the Benefits of a Streamlined Refinance Program
Gerardi, Kristopher; Loewenstein, Lara; Willen, Paul S.
(2020-06-25)
Mortgage borrowers who have experienced employment disruptions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic are unable to refinance their loans to take advantage of historically low market rates. In this article, we analyze the effects of a streamlined refinance ("refi") program for government-insured loans that would allow borrowers to refinance without needing to document employment or income. In addition, we consider a cash-out component that would allow borrowers to extract some of the substantial amount of housing equity that many have accumulated in recent years.
Policy Hub
, Volume 2020
, Issue 8
, Pages 22
Discussion Paper
Uneven Distribution of Household Debt by Gender, Race, and Education
Chakrabarti, Rajashri; Chatterji-Len, Kasey; Avtar, Ruchi
(2021-11-17)
Household debt has risen markedly since 2013 and amounts to more than $15 trillion dollars. While the aggregate volume of household debt has been well-documented, literature on the gender, racial and education distribution of debt is lacking, largely because of an absence of adequate data that combine debt, demographic, and education information. In a three-part series beginning with this post, we seek to bridge this gap. In this first post, we focus on differences in debt holding behavior across race and gender. Specifically, we explore gender and racial disparities in different types of ...
Liberty Street Economics
, Paper 20211117a
Discussion Paper
Debt Relief and the CARES Act: Which Borrowers Face the Most Financial Strain?
Chakrabarti, Rajashri; Haughwout, Andrew F.; Lee, Donghoon; Nober, William; Scally, Joelle; Van der Klaauw, Wilbert
(2020-08-19)
In yesterday's post, we studied the expected debt relief from the CARES Act on mortgagors and student debt borrowers. We now turn our attention to the 63 percent of American borrowers who do not have a mortgage or student loan. These borrowers will not directly benefit from the loan forbearance provisions of the CARES Act, although they may be able to receive some types of leniency that many lenders have voluntarily provided. We ask who these borrowers are, by age, geography, race and income, and how does their financial health compare with other borrowers.
Liberty Street Economics
, Paper 20200819
Journal Article
Credit risk transfer and de facto GSE reform
Strzodka, Andreas; Vickery, James; Finkelstein, David
(2018-24-03)
The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac credit risk transfer (CRT) programs, now in their fifth year, shift a portion of credit risk on more than $1.8 trillion of mortgages to private-sector investors. This study summarizes and evaluates the CRT programs, finding that they have been successful in reducing the exposure of the government-sponsored enterprises and the federal government to mortgage credit risk without disrupting the liquidity or stability of mortgage secondary markets. The programs have also created a new financial market for pricing and trading mortgage credit risk, which has grown in ...
Economic Policy Review
, Issue 24-3
, Pages 88-116
FILTER BY year
FILTER BY Bank
Federal Reserve Bank of New York 26 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 10 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 7 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 5 items
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 5 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 3 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 3 items
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.) 1 items
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 1 items
show more (4)
show less
FILTER BY Series
Liberty Street Economics 17 items
Working Papers 16 items
Staff Reports 6 items
FRB Atlanta Working Paper 4 items
Economic Policy Review 3 items
Policy Hub 3 items
Consumer Finance Institute discussion papers 2 items
Page One Economics Newsletter 2 items
Dallas Fed Economics 1 items
Economic Quarterly 1 items
Economic Synopses 1 items
Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1 items
New England Public Policy Center Regional Brief 1 items
Profitwise 1 items
Richmond Fed Economic Brief 1 items
Working Paper 1 items
show more (11)
show less
FILTER BY Content Type
Working Paper 22 items
Discussion Paper 21 items
Journal Article 7 items
Report 6 items
Briefing 2 items
Newsletter 2 items
show more (1)
show less
FILTER BY Author
Vickery, James 13 items
Lee, Donghoon 8 items
Chakrabarti, Rajashri 7 items
Willen, Paul S. 7 items
Fuster, Andreas 6 items
Lambie-Hanson, Lauren 6 items
Gerardi, Kristopher S. 5 items
Haughwout, Andrew F. 5 items
Tracy, Joseph 5 items
Van der Klaauw, Wilbert 5 items
Avtar, Ruchi 3 items
Chatterji-Len, Kasey 3 items
Gerardi, Kristopher 3 items
Hizmo, Aurel 3 items
Loewenstein, Lara 3 items
Plosser, Matthew 3 items
Scally, Joelle 3 items
Zhou, Xiaoqing 3 items
Aruoba, S. Boragan 2 items
Athreya, Kartik B. 2 items
Berg, Jesper 2 items
Bhutta, Neil 2 items
Biswas, Siddhartha 2 items
Calem, Paul S. 2 items
Conklin, James 2 items
Elul, Ronel 2 items
Finkelstein, David 2 items
Frame, W. Scott 2 items
Hossain, Mallick 2 items
Mather, Ryan 2 items
Mustre-del-Rio, Jose 2 items
Nielsen, Morten Bækmand 2 items
Nober, William 2 items
Phan, Toan 2 items
Sanchez, Juan M. 2 items
Strzodka, Andreas 2 items
Zink, David 2 items
Amromin, Gene 1 items
Bakkensen, Laura 1 items
Bertelsen, Kris 1 items
Chan, Sewin 1 items
Chiumenti, Nicholas 1 items
Dechario, Toni 1 items
Faria-e-Castro, Miguel 1 items
Fulford, Scott L. 1 items
Ge, Shan 1 items
Gorton, Nicole 1 items
Herkenhoff, Kyle F. 1 items
Johnson, Stephanie 1 items
Kalemli-Ozcan, Sebnem 1 items
Kandrac, John 1 items
Kenney, Jeanna 1 items
Kim, You Suk 1 items
Lee, Jonathan 1 items
Li, Wenli 1 items
Mangrum, Daniel 1 items
Mayer, Erik J. 1 items
McCormick, Matthew 1 items
McGranahan, Leslie 1 items
Mendez-Carbajo, Diego 1 items
Mosser, Patricia C. 1 items
Nakamura, Leonard I. 1 items
Ohanian, Lee E. 1 items
Ozcan, Sebnem Kalemli 1 items
Passmore, Wayne 1 items
Pinkovskiy, Maxim L. 1 items
Price, David A. 1 items
Ramasamy, Chellappan 1 items
Ringo, Daniel R. 1 items
Scharlemann, Tess C. 1 items
Schlusche, Bernd 1 items
Schnabl, Philipp 1 items
Shah, Akhtar 1 items
Stavins, Joanna 1 items
Tzur-Ilan, Nitzan 1 items
Walter, John R. 1 items
Wang, Jenna 1 items
Wilkinson, Olivia 1 items
Wong, Russell 1 items
Wright, Joshua 1 items
Xu, Billy 1 items
Yun, David 1 items
Zhang, David Hao 1 items
Zhao, Lawrence 1 items
von Hafften, Alexander H. 1 items
show more (80)
show less
FILTER BY Jel Classification
G21 30 items
G28 14 items
G23 12 items
D14 11 items
G51 10 items
E21 5 items
E44 5 items
G18 5 items
Q12 5 items
R31 5 items
E52 4 items
R3 4 items
R38 4 items
D1 3 items
D12 3 items
G01 3 items
G2 3 items
Q54 3 items
R10 3 items
D31 2 items
D58 2 items
E24 2 items
E32 2 items
G10 2 items
G11 2 items
G12 2 items
G15 2 items
G5 2 items
J15 2 items
L85 2 items
O16 2 items
R21 2 items
R30 2 items
C23 1 items
D13 1 items
D15 1 items
D22 1 items
D24 1 items
D25 1 items
D81 1 items
E02 1 items
E22 1 items
E30 1 items
E51 1 items
E60 1 items
G14 1 items
G22 1 items
G33 1 items
G52 1 items
G53 1 items
H81 1 items
I14 1 items
I24 1 items
J00 1 items
Q1 1 items
R51 1 items
show more (51)
show less
FILTER BY Keywords
COVID-19 10 items
credit cards 6 items
refinance 6 items
delinquency 5 items
monetary policy 5 items
debt 4 items
inequality 4 items
securitization 4 items
student debt 4 items
student loans 4 items
CUNY 3 items
Consumer Credit Panel 3 items
Fannie Mae 3 items
FinTech 3 items
Freddie Mac 3 items
GSE 3 items
cash-out 3 items
consumption 3 items
credit 3 items
credit card debt 3 items
default 3 items
financial intermediation 3 items
fintech 3 items
first-time home buyers 3 items
forbearance 3 items
housing 3 items
interest rates 3 items
nonbanks 3 items
CARES Act 2 items
Denmark 2 items
FHA 2 items
United States 2 items
auto 2 items
bank health 2 items
banking 2 items
bankruptcy 2 items
climate change 2 items
climate risk 2 items
collateral 2 items
covered bonds 2 items
credit risk transfer 2 items
credit supply 2 items
financial distress 2 items
foreclosure 2 items
foreclosures 2 items
general equilibrium 2 items
home equity 2 items
housing wealth 2 items
individual-level data 2 items
liquidity 2 items
pandemic 2 items
physical risk 2 items
poverty 2 items
prepayment risk 2 items
racial disparities 2 items
recession 2 items
regulation 2 items
technology 2 items
underinsurance 2 items
unemployment 2 items
wildfires 2 items
COVID 19 1 items
Cook County (Ill.) 1 items
Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act 1 items
Federal Reserve 1 items
Financial crisis 1 items
HDC 1 items
HELOC 1 items
Homeownership 1 items
LSAP 1 items
MBS 1 items
Monetary policy 1 items
NEPPC 1 items
New England 1 items
New York (City) 1 items
QE 1 items
adjustable-rate mortgages 1 items
appraisal 1 items
asset 1 items
auto debt 1 items
auto lenders 1 items
auto loan 1 items
auto loans 1 items
automated underwriting 1 items
bank 1 items
borrowers 1 items
budget 1 items
building and loan 1 items
census tract 1 items
cities 1 items
climate finance 1 items
closing costs 1 items
consumer credit panel 1 items
consumer protection 1 items
coronavirus 1 items
cost of funds 1 items
credit access 1 items
credit card utilization 1 items
credit reports 1 items
credit score 1 items
credit scores 1 items
default risk 1 items
degree 1 items
depression 1 items
discrimination 1 items
disposable income 1 items
down payment 1 items
education 1 items
employment 1 items
fair lending 1 items
finance 1 items
financial crisis 1 items
financial stability 1 items
firm dynamics 1 items
fixed-rate mortgages 1 items
government 1 items
government-sponsored enterprises 1 items
graduation 1 items
guarantee 1 items
heterogeneous beliefs 1 items
homeownership 1 items
household debt 1 items
household finance 1 items
households 1 items
information 1 items
insurance 1 items
interest 1 items
investment 1 items
jumbo 1 items
labor 1 items
lenders 1 items
lending 1 items
life insurance 1 items
liquidity constraints 1 items
litigation 1 items
longer maturities 1 items
longer-term borrowings 1 items
low income 1 items
medicare 1 items
mortgage approval 1 items
mortgage defaults 1 items
mortgage lender 1 items
mortgage securitization 1 items
mortgage-backed securities 1 items
negative equity 1 items
network effects 1 items
observable characteristics 1 items
origination vintages 1 items
prepayment 1 items
prepayment rates 1 items
prepayments 1 items
race 1 items
racial segregation 1 items
real estate 1 items
redlining 1 items
refinancing 1 items
regional transmission 1 items
rent 1 items
risk 1 items
savings goal 1 items
sea-level rise 1 items
search and matching 1 items
social networks 1 items
strategic default 1 items
student 1 items
term 1 items
wealth 1 items
show more (163)
show less