Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Keywords:maximum likelihood OR Maximum Likelihood 

Working Paper
Comparing Cross-Country Estimates of Lorenz Curves Using a Dirichlet Distribution Across Estimators and Datasets

Chotikapanich and Griffiths (2002) introduced the Dirichlet distribution to the estimation of Lorenz curves. This distribution naturally accommodates the proportional nature of income share data and the dependence structure between the shares. Chotikapanich and Griffiths (2002) fit a family of five Lorenz curves to one year of Swedish and Brazilian income share data using unconstrained maximum likelihood and unconstrained non-linear least squares. We attempt to replicate the authors' results and extend their analyses using both constrained estimation techniques and five additional years of ...
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 2017-062

Working Paper
Asymptotic variance approximations for invariant estimators in uncertain asset-pricing models

This paper derives explicit expressions for the asymptotic variances of the maximum likelihood and continuously updated GMM estimators under potentially misspecified models. The proposed misspecification-robust variance estimators allow the researcher to conduct valid inference on the model parameters even when the model is rejected by the data. Although the results for the maximum likelihood estimator are only applicable to linear asset-pricing models, the asymptotic distribution of the continuously updated GMM estimator is derived for general, possibly nonlinear, models. The large ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2015-9

Working Paper
Spurious Inference in Unidentified Asset-Pricing Models

This paper studies some seemingly anomalous results that arise in possibly misspecified and unidentified linear asset-pricing models estimated by maximum likelihood and one-step generalized method of moments (GMM). Strikingly, when useless factors (that is, factors that are independent of the returns on the test assets) are present, the models exhibit perfect fit, as measured by the squared correlation between the model's fitted expected returns and the average realized returns, and the tests for correct model specification have asymptotic power that is equal to the nominal size. In other ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2014-12

Working Paper
Too Good to Be True? Fallacies in Evaluating Risk Factor Models

This paper is concerned with statistical inference and model evaluation in possibly misspecified and unidentified linear asset-pricing models estimated by maximum likelihood and one-step generalized method of moments. Strikingly, when spurious factors (that is, factors that are uncorrelated with the returns on the test assets) are present, the models exhibit perfect fit, as measured by the squared correlation between the model's fitted expected returns and the average realized returns. Furthermore, factors that are spurious are selected with high probability, while factors that are useful are ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2017-9

FILTER BY year

FILTER BY Content Type

FILTER BY Author

Gospodinov, Nikolay 3 items

Kan, Raymond 3 items

Robotti, Cesare 3 items

Chang, Andrew C. 1 items

Li, Phillip 1 items

Martin, Shawn M. 1 items

show more (1)

FILTER BY Jel Classification

C12 3 items

C13 3 items

G12 3 items

C24 1 items

C51 1 items

C87 1 items

show more (2)

PREVIOUS / NEXT