Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Keywords:Monopolies 

Report
IER Lawrence Klein Lecture: the case against intellectual monopoly

In the modern theory of growth, monopoly plays a crucial role both as a cause and an effect of innovation. Innovative firms, it is argued, would have insufficient incentive to innovate should the prospect of monopoly power not be present. This theme of monopoly runs throughout the theory of growth, international trade, and industrial organization. We argue that monopoly is neither needed for, nor a necessary consequence of, innovation. In particular, intellectual property is not necessary for, and may hurt more than help, innovation and growth. We argue that, as a practical matter, it is more ...
Staff Report , Paper 339

Discussion Paper
Modelling complementarity in monopolistic competition

In recent years, monopolistic competition models have frequently been applied in macroeconomics, international and interregional economics, and economic growth and development. In this paper, I present a highly selective review in this area, with special emphasis on the complementarity and its role of generating multiplier processes, agglomeration, underdevelopment traps, regional disparities, and sustainable growth, or more generally, what Myrdal (1957) called the principle of circular and cumulative causation.
Discussion Paper / Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics , Paper 81

Working Paper
Learning in the marketplace: free entry is free riding

Working Papers , Paper 89-13

Working Paper
The location and quality effects of mergers

Working Papers , Paper 92-5

Report
Competition and productivity: a review of evidence

Does competition spur productivity? And if so, how does it do so? These have long been regarded as central questions in economics. This essay reviews the literature that makes progress toward answering both questions.
Staff Report , Paper 439

Working Paper
Structure, conduct, performance, and welfare

Working Papers , Paper 92-13

Report
Sunk costs, contestability, and the latent contract market

The idea that an industry with sunk costs may be contestable even in the absence of long-term contracts has received little attention from formal economic theory yet is popular among monopolists facing antitrust suits. The paper formally illustrates the argument. In an infinitely repeated game, there exists a class of contestable outcomes in which the monopolist sells only on the spot market and charges low prices along the equilibrium path to prevent customers from resorting to long-term contracts. Then, the crucial test for contestability is the level of transaction costs in the latent ...
Staff Reports , Paper 75

Journal Article
Competition at work : railroads vs. monopoly in the U.S. shipping industry

This study primarily establishes two things: (1) that monopoly has been pervasive in the U.S. water transportation industry in both the 19th and 20th centuries and has led to prices above competitive levels and the adoption of inefficient technologies and (2) that the competition of railroads has greatly weakened this monopolistic tendency, leading to lower water transport prices and fewer inefficient technologies. The study establishes these points using standard economic theory and extensive historical U.S. data on the behavior of unions and shipping companies. These gains from competition ...
Quarterly Review , Volume 25 , Issue Spr , Pages 3-29

Working Paper
Shared ownership and pricing in a network switch

Working Papers , Paper 94-6

Working Paper
A note on antitrust in a stochastic market

Working Papers , Paper 92-23

PREVIOUS / NEXT