Search Results

Showing results 1 to 10 of approximately 19.

(refine search)
SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Author:Moen, Jon R. 

Working Paper
Outside Lending in the NYC Call Loan Market

Before the Panic of 1907 the large New York City banks were able to maintain the call loan market?s liquidity during panics, but the rise in outside lending by trust companies and interior banks in the decade leading up the panic weakened the influence of the large banks. Creating a reliable source of liquidity and reserves external to the financial market like a central bank became obvious after the panic. The lack of a lender of last resort for investment banks engaged in bank-like activities during the crisis of 2007-09 revealed a similar need for an external liquidity source.
Working Papers (Old Series) , Paper 1408

Working Paper
The Transmission of the Financial Crisis in 1907: An Empirical Investigation

Using an extensive high-frequency data set, we investigate the transmission of financial crisis specifically focusing on the Panic of 1907, the final severe panic of the National Banking Era (1863-1913). We trace the transmission of the crisis from New York City trust companies to the New York City national banks through direct and indirect interconnections. Trust companies held cash balances at national banks, and these balances were liquidated as trust companies suffered depositor runs. Secondly, trust companies and national banks were notable creditors to the New York Stock Exchange; when ...
Working Papers (Old Series) , Paper 1409

Working Paper
New York and the politics of central banks, 1781 to the Federal Reserve Act

The paper provides a brief history of central banking institutions in the United States. Specifically, the authors highlight the role of New York banking interests in the legislations affecting the creation or expiration of central banking institutions. In our previous research we have detected that New York City banking entities usually exert substantial influence on legislation, greater than their large proportion of United States? banking resources. The authors describe how this influence affected the success or failure of central banking movements in the United States, and the authors use ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2003-42

Working Paper
Liquidity creation without a lender of last resort: clearing house loan certificates in the Banking Panic of 1907

We employ a new data set comprised of disaggregate figures on clearing house loan certificate issues in New York City to document how the dominant national banks were crucial providers of temporary liquidity during the Panic of 1907. Clearing house loan certificates were essentially ?bridge loans? arranged between clearing house members. They enabled and were issued in anticipation of gold imports, which took a few weeks to arrive. The large, New York City national banks acted as private liquidity providers by requesting (and the New York Clearing House issuing) a volume of clearing house ...
Working Papers (Old Series) , Paper 1010

Working Paper
Liquidity shocks and financial crises during the national banking era

FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 93-10

Journal Article
Lessons from the panic of 1907

Economic Review , Issue May , Pages 2-13

Working Paper
The call loan market in the U.S. financial system prior to the Federal Reserve System

The call loan market in New York City played a central role in funding the expansion of economic growth and capital investment in the United States in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Changes in the identity of the intermediaries providing those funds help explain why the movement for the establishment of a central bank in the United States took hold only after the panic of 1907. The growing significance of nonclearinghouse creditors to the call money market diluted the relative financial influence of the New York City bankers and compromised the apparent ?coinsurance? arrangement between ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2003-43

Working Paper
Clearinghouse access and bank runs: comparing New York and Chicago during the Panic of 1907

During the Panic of 1907, New York City trust companies were not members of the New York Clearinghouse whereas trust companies in Chicago were members of the Chicago Clearinghouse. We argue that the apparent isolation of New York City trust companies from the pool of bank reserves controlled by the New York Clearinghouse led to the large-scale depositor runs on the New York City trusts. In contrast, Chicago trust companies had direct access to the Chicago Clearinghouse and their pool of reserves and did not suffer large-scale depositor withdrawals. Statistical evidence on a cross-section of ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 95-9

Journal Article
Fewer older men in the U.S. work force: technological, behavioral, and legislative contributions to the decline

Economic Review , Issue Nov , Pages 16-31

PREVIOUS / NEXT