Discussion Paper
Tax reform and corporate capital structure
Warshawsky, Mark J. (1987)
Research Papers in Banking and Financial Economics , Paper 103

Discussion Paper
Private annuity markets in the United States: 1919-1984
Warshawsky, Mark J. (1987)
Research Papers in Banking and Financial Economics , Paper 96

Journal Article
Life insurance companies in a changing environment
Warshawsky, Mark J.; Curry, Timothy J. (1986-07)
Federal Reserve Bulletin , Issue Jul

Working Paper
Projections of health care expenditures as a share of GNP: actuarial and economic approaches
Warshawsky, Mark J. (1991)
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 170

Working Paper
Postretirement health benefit plans: costs and liabilities for private employers
Warshawsky, Mark J. (1989)
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 76

Discussion Paper
The adequacy and consistency of margin requirements in the markets for stocks and derivative products
Warshawsky, Mark J.; Dietrich, Earnhart (1989)
Staff Studies , Paper 158

Discussion Paper
The funding of private pension plans
Warshawsky, Mark J. (1987)
Staff Studies , Paper 155

Working Paper
Estimates of the effect of FAS 106 on corporate earnings
Cristea, Carrie; Warshawsky, Mark J.; Mittelstaedt, H. Fred (1992)
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 184

Working Paper
Factors contributing to rapid growth in national expenditures on health care
Warshawsky, Mark J. (1991)
Finance and Economics Discussion Series , Paper 182

Working Paper
Life-cycle saving, limits on contributions to DC pension plans, and lifetime tax benefits
Kotlikoff, Laurence J.; Gokhale, Jagadeesh; Warshawsky, Mark J. (2001)
This paper analyzes questions related to defined contribution (DC) plans. For what types of households are statutory contribution limits likely to bind? How large is the lifetime tax benefit from participating in a DC plan and how does it vary with lifetime income? The authors find that contribution limits bind for households that begin their plan participation late in life or wish to retire early, single-earner households, those who are not borrowing-constrained, those with rapid rates of real wage growth, and those with high levels of earnings regardless of age. Setting contribution rates ...
Working Papers (Old Series) , Paper 0102