Search Results
Working Paper
One Threshold Doesn’t Fit All: Tailoring Machine Learning Predictions of Consumer Default for Lower-Income Areas
Modeling advances create credit scores that predict default better overall, but raise concerns about their effect on protected groups. Focusing on low- and moderate-income (LMI) areas, we use an approach from the Fairness in Machine Learning literature — fairness constraints via group-specific prediction thresholds — and show that gaps in true positive rates (% of non-defaulters identified by the model as such) can be significantly reduced if separate thresholds can be chosen for non-LMI and LMI tracts. However, the reduction isn’t free as more defaulters are classified as good risks, ...
Working Paper
ForeComp: An R Package for Comparing Predictive Accuracy Using Fixed-Smoothing Asymptotics
We introduce ForeComp, an R package for comparing predictive accuracy using Diebold–Mariano type tests of equal predictive ability with standard and fixed-smoothing inference. The package provides a common interface for loss-differential based testing and includes Plot Tradeoff, a visual diagnostic for bandwidth sensitivity and the size–power tradeoff. We illustrate the toolkit with Survey of Professional Forecasters applications and Monte Carlo evidence on finite-sample performance.