Search Results
                                                                                    Journal Article
                                                                                
                                            After the refinancing boom: will consumers scale back their spending?
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    Concerns are rising that the recent surge in home equity withdrawal has left consumers in a weakened financial position that will, over time, prompt a retrenchment in spending. However, a look at household assets and liabilities suggests that consumers have used the withdrawn funds to restructure their balance sheets and reduce their debt service burden. As a result, households may be in a better position to spend in the years ahead.
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Discussion Paper
                                                                                
                                            Low Productivity Growth: The Capital Formation Link
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    A major economic concern is the ongoing sluggishness in the growth of output per worker hour, generally called labor productivity. In an arithmetic sense, the growth of the economy can be accounted for by the increase in hours worked plus that of labor productivity. With the unemployment rate now at a level widely regarded as near ?full employment,? growth in hours worked is likely to be limited by demographic forces, most importantly the very limited expansion of the working-age population. If productivity growth also remains low, the sustainable pace of increase of real GDP will be limited ...
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Discussion Paper
                                                                                
                                            Rebalancing the Economy in Response to Fiscal Consolidation
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), under current policies the ratio of federal debt held by the public over gross domestic product?the debt-to-GDP ratio?will rise rapidly over the next decade. This unsustainable fiscal position presents the nation with two significant challenges. First, it requires fiscal consolidation that will, at a minimum, cause the ratio to level off in the not-too-distant future. Second, fiscal consolidation has to occur in a way that will keep the U.S. economy operating at as close to full employment as possible?a process known as rebalancing. While ...
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Journal Article
                                                                                
                                            The parts are more than the whole: separating goods and services to predict core inflation
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    Economists have not been altogether successful in their efforts to forecast ?core? inflation?an inflation measure that typically excludes volatile food and energy prices. One possible explanation is that the models used to make these forecasts fail to distinguish the forces influencing price changes in core services from those affecting price changes in core goods. While core services inflation depends on long-run inflation expectations and the degree of slack in the labor market, core goods inflation depends on short-run inflation expectations and import prices. By using a composite model ...
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Discussion Paper
                                                                                
                                            Is the Recent Tax Reform Playing a Role in the Decline of Home Sales?
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    From the fourth quarter of  2017 through the third quarter of 2018, the average contract interest rate on new thirty-year fixed rate mortgages rose by roughly 70 basis points�from 3.9 percent to 4.6 percent. During this same period, there was a broad-based slowing in housing market activity with sales of new single-family homes declining by 7.6 percent while sales of existing single-family homes fell by 4.6 percent. Interestingly though, these declines in home sales were larger than in the two previous episodes when mortgage interest rates rose by a comparable amount. This post considers ...
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Discussion Paper
                                                                                
                                            First Impressions Can Be Misleading: Revisions to House Price Changes
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    An assiduous follower of the national house price charts that the New York Fed maintains on its web page may have noticed that we appear to be rewriting history as we update the charts every month. For example, last month we reported that the median twelve-month house price change across all counties for December 2012 was 3.68 percent. However, this month, we indicate that this same median change for December 2012 was instead 3.45 percent. Why the change? Was the earlier reported number a mistake that we simply corrected this month? If not, what explains the revision to the initial report?
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Journal Article
                                                                                
                                            The homeownership gap
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    Recent years have seen a sharp rise in the number of negative equity homeowners--those who owe more on their mortgages than their houses are worth. These homeowners are included in the official homeownership rate computed by the Census Bureau, but the savings they must amass to retain their home or purchase a new home are daunting. Recognizing that these homeowners are likely to convert to renters over time, the authors of this analysis calculate an "effective" rate of homeownership that excludes negative equity households. They argue that the effective rate--5.6 percentage points below ...
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Journal Article
                                                                                
                                            Credit, equity, and mortgage refinancings
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    Using a unique loan level data set that links individual household credit ratings with property and loan characteristics, the authors test the extent to which homeowners' credit ratings and equity affect the likelihood that mortgage loans will be refinanced as interest rates fall. Their logit model estimates strongly support the importance of both the credit and equity variables. Furthermore, the authors' results suggest that a change in the overall lending environment over the past decade has increased the probability that a homeowner will refinance.
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Discussion Paper
                                                                                
                                            The Homeownership Gap Is Finally Closing
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    The homeownership rate peaked at 69 percent in late 2004. By the summer of 2016, it had dropped below 63 percent—exactly where it was when the government started reporting these data back in 1965. The housing bust played a central role in this decline. We capture this effect through what we call the homeownership gap—the difference between the official homeownership rate and the “effective” rate where only homeowners with positive equity in their house are counted. The effective rate takes into account that a borrower does not in an economic sense own the house if the mortgage debt is ...
                                                                                                
                                            
                                                                                
                                    
                                                                                    Journal Article
                                                                                
                                            Monetary policy transmission to residential investment
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                                                                    
                                                                                                    Paper for a conference sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York entitled Financial Innovation and Monetary Transmission