Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Author:McCallum, Bennett T. 

Conference Paper
Inflation targeting and the liquidity trap

This paper considers whether "liquidity trap" issues have important bearing on the desirability of inflation targeting as a strategy for monetary policy. From a theoretical perspective, it has been suggested that "expectation trap" and "indeterminacy" dangers are created by variants of inflation targeting, the latter when forecasts of future inflation enter the policy rule. This paper argues that these alleged dangers are probably not of practical importance. From an empirical perspective, a quantitative open-economy model is developed and the likelihood of encountering a ...
Proceedings , Issue Mar

Journal Article
Monetary policy analysis in models without money

Review , Volume 83 , Issue Jul , Pages 145-164

Journal Article
Japanese monetary policy, 1991-2001

Economic Quarterly , Volume 89 , Issue Win , Pages 1-31

Conference Paper
Postwar developments in business cycle theory: a moderately classical perspective

Proceedings

Working Paper
Money stock control with reserve and interest rate instruments under rational expectations

Working Papers , Paper 8201

Journal Article
Macroeconomics after a decade of rational expectations : some critical issues

An abstract for this article is not available.
Economic Review , Volume 68 , Issue Nov , Pages 3-12

Working Paper
Identification of inflation-unemployment tradeoffs in the 1970s

Working Paper Series, Macroeconomic Issues , Paper 94-16

Journal Article
Commentary on \\"targeting versus instrument rules for monetary policy: what is wrong with McCallum and Nelson?\\"

The following are comments in response to Lars Svensson's "Targeting versus Instrument Rules for Monetary Policy: What Is Wrong with McCallum and Nelson?"
Review , Volume 87 , Issue Sep , Pages 627-632

Journal Article
Targeting versus instrument rules for monetary policy

Svensson (2003) argues strongly that specific targeting rules-first-order optimality conditions for a specific objective function and model-are normatively superior to instrument rules for the conduct of monetary policy. That argument is based largely on four main objections to the latter, plus a claim concerning the relative interest-instrument variability entailed by the two approaches. The present paper considers the four objections in turn and advances arguments that contradict all of them. Then, in the paper's analytical sections, it is demonstrated that the variability claim is ...
Review , Volume 87 , Issue Sep , Pages 597-612

FILTER BY year

FILTER BY Content Type

FILTER BY Author

Nelson, Edward 8 items

Goodfriend, Marvin 3 items

Bernanke, Ben S. 1 items

Blinder, Alan S. 1 items

Hoehn, James G. 1 items

show more (1)

PREVIOUS / NEXT