Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Author:Kahn, Charles M. 

Working Paper
Payment system settlement and bank incentives

In this paper we consider the relative merits of net versus gross settlement of interbank payments. Net settlement economizes on the costs of holding non-interest-bearing reserves but increases moral hazard problems. The "put option" value of default under net settlement can also distort banks' investment incentives. ; Absent these distortions, net settlement dominates gross, although the optimal net settlement scheme may involve a positive probability of default. Net settlement becomes more attractive relative to gross settlement if bank assets have to be liquidated at less than book value.
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 96-10

Discussion Paper
Standing Repo Facilities, Then and Now

Recently there have been discussions, both within the FOMC and more broadly, about whether the FOMC should set up a standing repo facility. Such a facility would allow banks to sell safe assets (U.S. Treasury securities) to the Fed, with the assurance of subsequent repurchase, in unlimited quantities at an administered rate. This is not a new idea. In fact, a similar facility was implemented in 1683by the Bank of Amsterdam, the leading central bank of the time, and operated for more than a century afterward. In this article, we describe the motivations, operations, and limitations of the Bank ...
Policy Hub , Paper 2020-1

Conference Paper
On the role of bank coalitions in the provision of liquidity

Proceedings , Paper 590

Conference Paper
Payment system settlement and bank incentives

Proceedings , Paper 537

Working Paper
Real-time gross settlement and the costs of immediacy

Using a neoclassical monetary model, we investigate the welfare cost of a payment system that operates as a real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system. We illustrate how the cost of such systems does not ultimately derive from factors such as "payments gridlock" but instead from the credit constraints imposed by RTGS. We also investigate the welfare consequences of various approaches to the allocation of daylight credit by central banks. The two most popular approaches, collateralization and charging an administered intraday interest rate, are shown to be effective along some dimensions but ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 98-21

Journal Article
The Fed and Its Shadow: A Historical View

Central bank policies have always incorporated both a discretionary or active component and a passive component. Successful central banking has required a coordination of the two components. After a period of apparent dormancy, the passive component of monetary policy has emerged from the shadows and become relevant for Federal Reserve policy today.
Policy Hub , Volume 2023 , Issue 6 , Pages 32

Working Paper
The CLS Bank: a solution to the risks of international payments settlement?

Foreign exchange transactions are subject to a unique type of settlement risk. This risk ultimately stems from the difficulty of coordinating separate settlements in two different currencies. Settlement of foreign exchange transactions through the proposed CLS (?Continuous Linked Settlement?) Bank has been discussed as a potential solution to this problem. This paper describes the CLS proposal and analyzes the incentives it places on banks engaged in foreign exchange transactions. The analysis shows that while settlement through the CLS Bank may represent an improvement over current ...
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2000-15

Conference Paper
Housing-finance intervention and private incentives: helping minorities and the poor

Proceedings

Working Paper
Optimal contingent bank liquidation under moral hazard

Working Paper Series, Issues in Financial Regulation , Paper 91-13

Working Paper
Payments settlement under limited enforcement: Private versus public systems

What are the benefits provided by a payment system? What are the tradeoffs in public versus private payment systems and in restricted versus open payments arrangements? Modern payment systems encompass a variety of institutional designs with varying degrees of counterparty protection. We develop a framework which allows for an examination and comparison of payment systems and specification of conditions leading to their adoption. We relate these conditions to the design of present large-value payment systems (Fedwire, CHIPS, Target, etc.).
FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 2002-33

FILTER BY year

FILTER BY Content Type

FILTER BY Jel Classification

E58 4 items

E42 3 items

E51 2 items

G21 2 items

G22 2 items

G23 2 items

show more (9)

FILTER BY Keywords

Payment systems 12 items

Bank liquidity 3 items

Checks 3 items

Money 3 items

Risk 3 items

Financial institutions 2 items

show more (70)

PREVIOUS / NEXT