Search Results
Working Paper
Should We Be Puzzled by Forward Guidance?
Although a growing literature argues output is too sensitive to future interest rates in standard macroeconomic models, little empirical evidence has been put forth to evaluate this claim. In this paper, we use a range of vector autoregression models to answer the central question of how much output responds to changes in interest rate expectations following a monetary policy shock. Despite distinct identification strategies and sample periods, we find surprising agreement regarding this elasticity across empirical models. We then show that in a standard model of nominal rigidity estimated ...
Working Paper
Maintaining the Anchor: An Evaluation of Inflation Targeting in the Face of COVID-19
This paper provides evidence that inflation targeting delivered well-anchored inflation expectations during the post-2020 inflation surge. Using a macroeconomic model, we first illustrate how long-term nominal interest rates respond to an unexpected burst of inflation under both anchored and unanchored inflation expectations. Then, we evaluate these predictions using high-frequency financial market data from nine advanced economies. Specifically, we examine whether inflation expectations embedded in asset prices remained anchored as inflation climbed in the aftermath of the pandemic. Our ...
Journal Article
A Tight Labor Market Could Keep Rent Inflation Elevated
Rent inflation responds more to labor market conditions compared with other components of inflation. We attribute this link between labor market tightness and rent inflation to greater demand for rental units afforded by job gains and wage growth. Although online measures of asking rents currently suggest official measures of rent inflation will decline, we caution that rent inflation is likely to remain above pre-pandemic levels so long as the labor market remains tight.
Journal Article
Evaluating Quantitative Easing: The Importance of Accounting for Forward Guidance
During the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, policymakers used large-scale asset purchases (LSAPs) along with forward guidance about the future path of the federal funds rate to help stabilize financial markets. However, policymakers and economists have yet to reach a consensus on the efficacy of LSAPs in providing accommodation and improving macroeconomic outcomes. Because announced changes in LSAPs often coincide with changes in forward guidance, the market responses to these two tools can be difficult to disentangle and each tool’s efficacy challenging to evaluate.Brent Bundick and A. Lee Smith ...
Working Paper
Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand
Can increased uncertainty about the future cause a contraction in output and its components? An identified uncertainty shock in the data causes significant declines in output, consumption, investment, and hours worked. Standard general-equilibrium models with flexible prices cannot reproduce this comovement. However, uncertainty shocks can easily generate comovement with countercyclical markups through sticky prices. Monetary policy plays a key role in offsetting the negative impact of uncertainty shocks during normal times. Higher uncertainty has even more negative effects if monetary ...
Journal Article
Introducing the Kansas City Fed's Measure of Policy Rate Uncertainty (KC PRU)
Monitoring uncertainty around the future path of interest rates can help ensure that monetary policy is transmitting to the economy as intended. Because uncertainty is not directly observable, measuring uncertainty about the future policy rate can be difficult. Previous measures often face two key limitations. First, they may be released with a lag, making them less useful as a timely measure of policy rate uncertainty. Second, they may not be available over a long sample, making it difficult to compare measures of current uncertainty with historical context.In this article, Brent Bundick, A. ...
Working Paper
From Deviations to Shortfalls: The Effects of the FOMC’s New Employment Objective
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) recently revised its interpretation of its maximum employment mandate. In this paper, we analyze the possible effects of this policy change using a theoretical model with frictional labor markets and nominal rigidities. A monetary policy that stabilizes employment “shortfalls” rather than “deviations” of employment from its maximum level leads to higher inflation and more hiring at all times due to firms’ expectations of more accommodative future policy. Thus, offsetting only shortfalls of employment results in higher inflation, employment, ...