Search Results

SORT BY: PREVIOUS / NEXT
Author:Benston, George J. 

Journal Article
Roundtable discussion: reflection on twenty years of bank regulatory reform

In 1986 the American Bankers Association asked five banking academics to assess and recommend policy options to improve the banking system's efficiency, performance, and safety. The report these five economists produced, Perspectives on Safe and Sound Banking: Past, Present, and Future, has in many ways served as a roadmap for ensuing bank regulatory reforms. In this roundtable discussion, each of the five authors reflects on the past twenty years and the current status of the banking industry and, in some cases, shares thoughts about the industry's future direction.
Economic Review , Issue Q1-2 , Pages 119-138

Journal Article
Deposit insurance reform in the FDIC Improvement Act: the experience to date

In 1991, the U.S. adopted fundamental deposit insurance reform in the FDIC Improvement Act. This article reveals why such reform was necessary in light of the severe banking crisis of the 1980s and analyzes its success to date.
Economic Perspectives , Volume 22 , Issue Q II , Pages 2-20

Discussion Paper
Economies of scale and scope in banking

Research Papers in Banking and Financial Economics , Paper 64

Conference Paper
FSLIC forbearance and the thrift debacle

Proceedings , Paper 351

Discussion Paper
Scale economies in banking: a restructuring and reassessment

Research Papers in Banking and Financial Economics , Paper 53

Conference Paper
Market-value accounting: benefits, costs and incentives

Proceedings , Paper 255

Conference Paper
Market discipline: the role of uninsured depositors and other market participants

Conference Series ; [Proceedings] , Volume 37 , Pages 65-95

Working Paper
Motivations for bank mergers and acquisitions: enhancing the deposit insurance put option versus increasing operating net cash flow

FRB Atlanta Working Paper , Paper 92-4

Journal Article
How should banks account for loan losses?

The agencies that regulate banks are involved in an ongoing debate about the appropriate way for banks and other lenders to account for default risk on loans. Accounting authorities are concerned with whether the accounting method meets the needs of general-purpose users of financial statements, particularly investors. In contrast, bank supervisors are concerned about banks being inadequately capitalized and possibly failing. ; To shed light on this debate, this article reviews the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) currently used, which are based on historic-cost values for ...
Economic Review , Volume 90 , Issue Q4 , Pages 19-38

FILTER BY year

FILTER BY Content Type

PREVIOUS / NEXT