Home About Latest Browse RSS Advanced Search

Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Staff Reports
Was the New Deal contractionary?
Gauti B. Eggertsson

Can government policies that increase the monopoly power of firms and the militancy of unions increase output? This paper studies this question in a dynamic general equilibrium model with nominal frictions and shows that these policies are expansionary when certain "emergency" conditions apply. I argue that these emergency conditions-zero interest rates and deflation-were satisfied during the Great Depression in the United States. Therefore, the New Deal, which facilitated monopolies and union militancy, was expansionary, according to the model. This conclusion is contrary to the one reached by Cole and Ohanian, who argue that the New Deal was contractionary. The main reason for this divergence is that the current model incorporates nominal frictions so that inflation expectations play a central role in the analysis. The New Deal has a strong effect on inflation expectations in the model, changing excessive deflation to modest inflation, thereby lowering real interest rates and stimulating spending.

Download Full text
Download Full text
Cite this item
Gauti B. Eggertsson, Was the New Deal contractionary?, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Reports 264, 2006.
More from this series
JEL Classification:
Subject headings:
Keywords: Financial crises ; Depressions ; Inflation (Finance) ; Economic forecasting
For corrections, contact Amy Farber ()
Fed-in-Print is the central catalog of publications within the Federal Reserve System. It is managed and hosted by the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Privacy Legal