Working Paper
Dealing with consumer default: bankruptcy vs. garnishment
Abstract: What are the positive and normative implications of eliminating bankruptcy protection for indebted individuals? Without bankruptcy protection, creditors can collect on defaulted debt to the extent permitted by wage garnishment laws. The elimination lowers the default premium on unsecured debt and permits low-net-worth individuals suffering bad earnings shocks to smooth consumption by borrowing. There is a large increase in consumer debt financed essentially by super-wealthy individuals, a modest drop in capital per worker, and a higher frequency of consumer default. Average welfare rises by 1 percent of consumption in perpetuity, with about 90 percent of households favoring the change.
Keywords: Default (Finance); Bankruptcy; Consumer credit;
Access Documents
File(s): File format is application/pdf https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/working-papers/2011/wp11-35.pdf
Authors
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Part of Series: Working Papers
Publication Date: 2011
Number: 11-35