Journal Article
An economic analysis of liquidity-saving mechanisms
Abstract: A recent innovation in large-value payments systems has been the design and implementation of liquidity-saving mechanisms (LSMs), tools used in conjunction with real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems. LSMs give system participants, such as banks, an option not offered by RTGS alone: they can queue their outgoing payments. Queued payments are released if some prespecified event occurs. LSMs can reduce the amount of central bank balances necessary to operate a payments system as well as quicken settlement. This article analyzes the performance of RTGS systems with and without the addition of an LSM. The authors find that, in terms of settling payments early, these mechanisms typically outperform pure RTGS systems. However, there are times when RTGS systems can be preferable to LSMs, such as when many banks that send payments early in RTGS choose to queue their payments when an LSM is available. The authors also show that the design of a liquidity-saving mechanism has important implications for the welfare of system participants, even in the absence of payment netting. In particular, the parameters specified determine whether the addition of an LSM increases or decreases welfare.
Keywords: Bank liquidity; Banks and banking, Central; Payment systems;
Access Documents
File(s): File format is application/pdf https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/08v14n2/0809mcan.pdf
File(s): File format is text/html https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/epr/08v14n2/0809mcan.html
Authors
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Part of Series: Economic Policy Review
Publication Date: 2008
Volume: 14
Issue: Sep
Pages: 25-39