Working Paper

Risk-Shifting, Regulation, and Government Assistance

Abstract: This paper examines an episode when policy response to a financial crisis effectively incentivized financial institutions to reallocate their portfolios toward safe assets. Following a shift to a regime of enhanced regulation and scaled-down public assistance during the savings and loan crisis in 1989, I find that thrifts with a high probability of failure increased their composition of safe assets relative to thrifts with a low probability of failure. The findings also show a shift to safe assets among stock thrifts relative to mutual thrifts, thereby providing evidence of risk-shifting from equity-holders to debt-holders of stock thrifts prior to the regulatory reforms. These findings suggest that for recent policies aimed at reducing moral hazard to succeed (such as the Orderly Liquidation Authority under Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act), credible signals around government assistance should be provided to shareholders of financial institutions. To identify the effect of the policy change I develop a new Bayesian estimation method for causal studies.

Keywords: Bank Failures; Bailouts; Moral Hazard; Risk-shifting; Bayesian Inference; Savings and loans crisis; Maskov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC); Federal Savings and Loans Insurance Corporation (FSLIC); Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC);

JEL Classification: C11; C31; C33; G21; G33; G38;

https://doi.org/10.18651/RWP2019-10

Bibliographic Information

Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Part of Series: Research Working Paper

Publication Date: 2019-11-26

Number: RWP 19-10