Working Paper

What we don’t know doesn’t hurt us: rational inattention and the permanent income hypothesis in general equilibrium


Abstract: This paper derives the general equilibrium effects of rational inattention (or RI; Sims 2003,2010) in a model of incomplete income insurance (Huggett 1993, Wang 2003). We show that,under the assumption of CARA utility with Gaussian shocks, the permanent income hypothesis (PIH) arises in steady state equilibrium due to a balancing of precautionary savings and impatience. We then explore how RI affects the equilibrium joint dynamics of consumption, income and wealth, and find that elastic attention can make the model fit the data better. We finally show that the welfare costs of incomplete information are even smaller due to general equilibrium adjustments in interest rates.

Keywords: Permanent income hypothesis; General equilibrium; Rational inattention; Consumption and income volatility.;

JEL Classification: E21; C61; D83;

Access Documents

File(s): File format is application/pdf http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/reswkpap/pdf/rwp14-14.pdf
Description: Full text

Authors

Bibliographic Information

Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Part of Series: Research Working Paper

Publication Date: 2014-11-01

Number: RWP 14-14

Pages: 41 pages