Working Paper

How to Reform US Long-Term Care


Abstract: Long-term care is costly. About 45 percent of 65-year-old Americans will require formal long-term care assistance during their lifetime and one in twelve will incur out-of-pocket expenses of $200,000 or more. Surprisingly, only 10 percent of retirees have private long-term care insurance. We use a quantitative structural model to show that an obstacle to increasing coverage is disagreement across the income distribution: scaling back public long-term care insurance expands the private market and benefits the affluent but imposes large welfare losses on the poor, while universal public insurance does the opposite. We then show that making the main public insurer, Medicaid, the primary rather than the secondary payer of long-term care costs, while retaining its means tests, raises welfare for nearly all Americans. Private insurers respond by offering smaller, more profitable policies, and total coverage against long-term care risk rises with only a modest increase in public expenditures.

JEL Classification: D82; D91; E62; G22; H30; I13;

https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202625

Access Documents

File(s): File format is text/html https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-202625
Description: Persistent link

Authors

Bibliographic Information

Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Part of Series: Working Papers

Publication Date: 2026-09-28

Number: 26-25