Working Paper
Two flaws in business cycle dating
Abstract: Using ?business cycle accounting,? Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan (2006) conclude that models of financial frictions which create a wedge in the intertemporal Euler equation are not promising avenues for modeling business cycle dynamics. There are two reasons that this conclusion is not warranted. First, small changes in the implementation of business cycle accounting overturn Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan?s conclusions. Second, one way that shocks to the intertemporal wedge affect the economy is by their spillover effects onto other wedges. This potentially important mechanism for the transmission of intertemporal-wedge shocks is not identified under business cycle accounting. Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan potentially understate the importance of these shocks by adopting the extreme position that spillover effects are zero.
Keywords: Business cycles;
https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-200612
Access Documents
File(s):
https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-200612
Description: Persistent link
File(s):
File format is application/pdf
https://www.clevelandfed.org/-/media/project/clevelandfedtenant/clevelandfedsite/publications/working-papers/2006/wp-0612-two-flaws-in-business-cycle-dating-pdf.pdf
Description: Full text
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Part of Series: Working Papers (Old Series)
Publication Date: 2006
Number: 0612