Working Paper
Market- vs. bank-based financial systems: do investor rights really matter?
Abstract: Why are common-law countries market-dominated and civil-law countries bank-dominated when either financial structure can promote economic growth? This paper provides an explanation tied to legal traditions. Civil-law courts have been less effective in resolving conflicts than common-law courts because civil-law judges traditionally refrain from interpreting the codes and creating new rules. Banks can induce borrowers to honor their obligations by threatening to withhold services that only banks can provide.
Keywords: Comparative law; Financial markets;
https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-200101r
Access Documents
File(s):
https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-200101r
Description: Persistent link
File(s):
File format is application/pdf
https://www.clevelandfed.org/-/media/project/clevelandfedtenant/clevelandfedsite/publications/working-papers/2001/wp-0101r-market-vs-bank-based-financial-systems-pdf.pdf
Description: Full text
Authors
Bibliographic Information
Provider: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
Part of Series: Working Papers (Old Series)
Publication Date: 2002
Number: 0101R