Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Why did the average duration of unemployment become so much longer?
This paper examines the causes of the observed increase in the average duration of unemployment over the past thirty years. First we analyze whether changes in the demographic composition of the U.S. labor force, particularly the age and gender composition, can explain this increase. We then consider the contribution of institutional changes, such as the change in the generosity and coverage of unemployment insurance. We find that changes in the composition of the labor force and institutional changes can only partially account for the longer duration of unemployment. We construct a job search model and calibrate it to U.S. data. The results indicate that more than 70 percent of the increase in the duration of unemployment over the past thirty years can be attributed to an increase in within-group wage inequality.
Cite this item
Toshihiko Mukoyama & Aysegül Sahin, Why did the average duration of unemployment become so much longer?, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Reports 194, 01 Sep 2004.
Note: For a published version of this report, see Toshihiko Mukoyama and Ayşegül Şahin, "Why Did the Average Duration of Unemployment Become So Much Longer?" Journal of Monetary Economics 56, no. 2 (March 2009): 200-9.
- E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
- J64 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
Keywords: Unemployment; Labor market; Demography; Unemployment insurance
This item with handle RePEc:fip:fednsr:194
is also listed on EconPapers
For corrections, contact Amy Farber ()