On December 12, 2019, Fed in Print will introduce its new platform for discovering content. Please direct your questions to Anna Oates
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Working Paper Series
Signaling Effects of Monetary Policy
AbstractWe develop a dynamic general equilibrium model in which the policy rate signals the central bank’s view about macroeconomic developments to price setters. The model is estimated with likelihood methods on a U.S. data set that includes the Survey of Professional Forecasters as a measure of price setters’ inflation expectations. This model improves upon existing perfect information models in explaining why, in the data, inflation expectations respond with delays to monetary impulses and remain disanchored for years. In the 1970s, U.S. monetary policy is found to signal persistent inflationary shocks, explaining why inflation and inflation expectations were so persistently heightened. The signaling effects of monetary policy also explain why inflation expectations adjusted more sluggishly than inflation after the robust monetary tightening of the 1980s.
Cite this item
Leonardo Melosi, Signaling Effects of Monetary Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Working Paper Series WP-2016-14, 16 Sep 2016.
JEL Classification:
- C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
- C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
- D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy
Keywords: Disanchoring of inflation expectations; heterogeneous beliefs; endogenous signals; Bayesian VAR; Bayesian counterfactual analysis; Delphic effects of monetary policy
This item with handle
RePEc:fip:fedhwp:wp-2016-14 is also listed on
EconPapers and
IDEAS.
For corrections, contact Bernie Flores ()