Home About Latest Browse RSS Advanced Search

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
Working Paper Series
The costs and benefits of moral suasion: evidence from the rescue of Long-Term Capital Management
Craig Furfine
Abstract

This study examines the level of unsecured borrowing done by the firms that would ultimately rescue Long-Term Capital Management in the days leading up to the hedge fund's rescue. Although there is some evidence that these banks borrowed less at the height of the crisis, further examination reveals that this reduction in borrowing was demand-driven and did not result from rationing on the part of the market. This suggests that the market believed that the troubles at LTCM would not have solvency-threatening repercussions for the fund's major creditors. Further, it is shown that large banks that were not involved with the LTCM rescue saw the rates they pay for unsecured funds decline following the hedge fund's resolution. This finding is consistent with an increase in the perceived strength of a too-big-to-fail policy.


Download Full text
Cite this item
Craig Furfine, The costs and benefits of moral suasion: evidence from the rescue of Long-Term Capital Management, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Working Paper Series WP-02-11, 2002.
More from this series
JEL Classification:
Subject headings:
Keywords: Banks and banking - Costs ; Bank capital ; Hedge funds
For corrections, contact Bernie Flores ()
Fed-in-Print is the central catalog of publications within the Federal Reserve System. It is managed and hosted by the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Privacy Legal