Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Divest, Disregard, or Double Down?
How much, if at all, should an endowment invest in a firm whose activities run counter to the charitable missions the endowment funds? Endowments typically disregard the objectionable nature of or divest from such firms. However, if firm returns increase with activities the endowment combats, doubling down on the investment increases expected utility by aligning funding availability with need. I call this "mission hedging." This paper offers the first model that characterizes the endowment's investment decision on the objectionable firm, defines investment trade-offs, and examines related evidence. Bad actors provide good opportunities to hedge mission-specific risks.
Cite this item
Brigitte Roth Tran, Divest, Disregard, or Double Down?, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2017-042, Apr 2017.
- G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
- L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
- D64 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
- Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
Keywords: Socially responsible investing ; Divestment ; Endowment ; Foundation ; Philanthropy ; Portfolio ; Universities and colleges
This item with handle RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2017-42
is also listed on EconPapers
For corrections, contact Ryan Wolfslayer ()