On December 12, 2019, Fed in Print will introduce its new platform for discovering content. Please direct your questions to Anna Oates

Home About Latest Browse RSS Advanced Search

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US)
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Macroeconomic Policy Games
Martin Bodenstein
Luca Guerrieri
Joe LaBriola
Abstract

Strategic interactions between policymakers arise whenever each policymaker has distinct objectives. Deviating from full cooperation can result in large welfare losses. To facilitate the study of strategic interactions, we develop a toolbox that characterizes the welfare-maximizing cooperative Ramsey policies under full commitment and open-loop Nash games. Two examples for the use of our toolbox offer some novel results. The first example revisits the case of monetary policy coordination in a two-country model to confirm that our approach replicates well-known results in the literature and extends these results by highlighting their sensitivity to the choice of policy instrument. For the second example, a central bank and a macroprudential regulator are assigned distinct objectives in a model with financial frictions. Lack of coordination leads to large welfare losses even if technology shocks are the only source of fluctuations.


Download Full text
Cite this item
Martin Bodenstein & Luca Guerrieri & Joe LaBriola, Macroeconomic Policy Games, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2014-87, 23 Sep 2014.
More from this series
JEL Classification:
Subject headings:
Keywords: Optimal policy; strategic interaction; welfare analysis; monetary policy cooperation; marcroprudential regulation
For corrections, contact Ryan Wolfslayer ()
Fed-in-Print is the central catalog of publications within the Federal Reserve System. It is managed and hosted by the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Privacy Legal