On December 12, 2019, Fed in Print will introduce its new platform for discovering content. Please direct your questions to Anna Oates

Home About Latest Browse RSS Advanced Search

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
Staff Papers
How bad was it? The costs and consequences of the 2007–09 financial crisis
Tyler Atkinson
David Luttrell
Harvey Rosenblum
Abstract

The 2007–09 financial crisis was associated with a huge loss of economic output and financial wealth, psychological consequences and skill atrophy from extended unemployment, an increase in government intervention, and other significant costs. Assuming the financial crisis is to blame for these associated ills, an estimate of its cost is needed to weigh against the cost of policies intended to prevent similar episodes. We conservatively estimate that 40 to 90 percent of one year's output ($6 trillion to $14 trillion, the equivalent of $50,000 to $120,000 for every U.S. household) was foregone due to the 2007–09 recession. We also provide several alternative measures of lost consumption, national trauma, and other negative consequences of the worst recession since the 1930s. This more comprehensive evaluation of factors suggests that what the U.S. gave up as a result of the crisis is likely greater than the value of one year's output.


Download Full text
Cite this item
Tyler Atkinson & David Luttrell & Harvey Rosenblum, "How bad was it? The costs and consequences of the 2007–09 financial crisis" , Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Staff Papers, issue Jul, 2013.
More from this series
JEL Classification:
Subject headings:
For corrections, contact Amy Chapman ()
Fed-in-Print is the central catalog of publications within the Federal Reserve System. It is managed and hosted by the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Privacy Legal