Home About Latest Browse RSS Advanced Search

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
New England Economic Review
Defense cutbacks and the New England economy
Yolanda K. Henderson
Abstract

Defense is a regrettable expenditure. Like law enforcement and insurance, defense spending may be necessary but intrinsically it does not make us feel better off in the same way as, for example, housing, transportation services, and education. Thus the reductions in East- West tensions that enable us to allocate more dollars to items that directly improve living standards should be welcome. ; Nevertheless, adjustment to a lower level of defense spending has costs. Reduced demand for defense services will cause disruptions for defense-oriented companies and their workers. Concern is especially high in New England, which is home to a disproportionate share of the nation’s defense contractors. This article examines New England’s economic costs from lower defense spending. The author finds that while the reduced expenditures on defense will have a noticeable negative effect on the region’s output, this will not be as great as in past cutbacks. However, the coincidence of defense reductions with other economic problems in New England will tend to magnify the difficulty of adjustment.


Download Full text
Cite this item
Yolanda K. Henderson, "Defense cutbacks and the New England economy" , Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, New England Economic Review, issue Jul, pages 3-24, 1990.
More from this series
JEL Classification:
Subject headings:
Keywords: Defense contracts ; New England
For corrections, contact Catherine Spozio ()
Fed-in-Print is the central catalog of publications within the Federal Reserve System. It is managed and hosted by the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Privacy Legal