On December 12, 2019, Fed in Print will introduce its new platform for discovering content. Please direct your questions to Anna Oates

Home About Latest Browse RSS Advanced Search

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
FRB Atlanta Working Paper
Too Good to Be True? Fallacies in Evaluating Risk Factor Models
Nikolay Gospodinov
Raymond Kan
Cesare Robotti
Abstract

This paper is concerned with statistical inference and model evaluation in possibly misspecified and unidentified linear asset-pricing models estimated by maximum likelihood and one-step generalized method of moments. Strikingly, when spurious factors (that is, factors that are uncorrelated with the returns on the test assets) are present, the models exhibit perfect fit, as measured by the squared correlation between the model's fitted expected returns and the average realized returns. Furthermore, factors that are spurious are selected with high probability, while factors that are useful are driven out of the model. Although ignoring potential misspecification and lack of identification can be very problematic for models with macroeconomic factors, empirical specifications with traded factors (e.g., Fama and French, 1993, and Hou, Xue, and Zhang, 2015) do not suffer of the identification problems documented in this study.


Download Full text
Cite this item
Nikolay Gospodinov & Raymond Kan & Cesare Robotti, Too Good to Be True? Fallacies in Evaluating Risk Factor Models, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2017-9, 01 Nov 2017.
More from this series
JEL Classification:
Subject headings:
Keywords: asset pricing; spurious risk factors; unidentified models; model misspecification; continuously updated GMM; maximum likelihood; goodness-of-fit; rank test
For corrections, contact Elaine Clokey ()
Fed-in-Print is the central catalog of publications within the Federal Reserve System. It is managed and hosted by the Economic Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Privacy Legal